Showing posts with label IUP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IUP. Show all posts

Friday, February 4, 2011

Module III Classes


Today concluded the first week of spring semester classes at IUP.  If this week has been in any way representative of what’s in store for this module, the next seven weeks will be a challenge, but in a refreshing and rewarding way.  The topics of my classes have started to turn from issues in every-day life and society to more academic topics.  For example, my main textbook, 学术中文漫步 (A Stroll through Academic Topics in Chinese), is a collection of real lectures given by Chinese professors in a range of fields.  It’s a fun textbook because not only are the lessons interesting in their own right, the vocabulary and sentence structures are also quite useful for discussing abstractions.

What’s even more exciting for me is my cailiao (individualized) class. Twice a week, I select a new article to read from the Chinese translation of Scientific American (“科学美国人”).  It’s a class I always feel motivated to put effort into, because I’m always reading articles that I’ve selected (and, naturally, am interested in). It’s also partly the excitement of reading “real” and up-to-date materials that makes this class so refreshing.  The topics I’ve selected range from chimpanzees and Jane Goodall, to internet freedom, to predictions of how video games will change our lives.  One night while reading the Yale Daily News, I stumbled across an article about New Haven’s recent acquisition of dynamically priced parking meters.  This was essentially the same topic of the article I had read in Scientific American earlier that day in Chinese – complete with references to the same scientists!  It’s no incredible accomplishment, but it still made for an exciting and satisfying realization, nonetheless.  The other aspect of the class I like is that, since my teacher knows I’m interested in math and science, she will frequently seize tangents in our conversation to teach me simple, but highly useful, mathematical or scientific terms, like “inversely proportional,” “multi-dimensional,” or “solid/liquid/gaseous state.”

On another note, I went to Hong Kong a few weeks ago.  I have lots to say about the trip, so I will try to write a post on that in the near future.

share on: facebook

Saturday, December 25, 2010

IUP Midterm Report


Disclaimer

This is a midterm report for the Inter-University Program (IUP). I’m writing with potential fall, spring, or academic year applicants in mind. I can’t promise that any of what I say here applies to IUP’s summer module (although I would assume most academic features are the same). I’m also writing with the assumption that the potential fall/spring/academic year IUP applicant has probably studied at least three years and/or already studied in China. I also make lots of comparisons to PiB, just for perspective.

Classes

IUP will tell you – and they are correct – that the most prominent feature of their classes is class size. They are tiny. Really tiny. Most of my Yale Chinese classes probably had about 13 or more students. At PiB, the larger classes had eight students, the smaller four. In comparison, the largest classes at IUP have a maximum of three. Yes, three students. I think in studying foreign language, class size makes a huge difference. I’ve found that in larger classes, your best chance to speak is generally if the teacher is drilling – i.e. everyone forms one sentence using some new sentence structure. With classes of only three students, however, there is more opportunity for a conversational teaching style. Not only is this dynamic more effective and closer to a natural linguistic environment, it is more enjoyable. There’s more opportunity to engage with ideas. The structure of class is pretty flexible, too, but in a positive way. I remember one of my classmates telling me that one day in one of her classes, all three students decided they were not interested in that day’s subject. They asked to talk about a different topic, to which their teacher responded “Sure, as long as we can find a way to incorporate today’s vocabulary.” Because of class size, you’re also placed with classmates who are at a very comparable level. In addition, at least one hour of class every day is completely one-on-one. This is great because, even though your teacher is still presenting a certain set of material, you can ask questions unlimitedly, which I think is a really efficient way to learn.

Placement and Curriculum

IUP is a relatively high level program. Even though the stated minimum requirement is two years of college Chinese, in reality, the vast majority of students have had the equivalent of three years. Most have also spent time in China before, whether at a summer program like PiB, a school year study abroad program, or just living and working.

IUP has a series of core textbooks, and core listening textbooks. The former is intended to improve skills in all areas – reading, writing, listening, and speaking – and the latter is more focused on just listening and speaking. Placements for these two core classes, although strongly correlated, are independent. Thus, there really is no notion of “third year, fourth year, fifth year, etc.” at IUP. Having completed fourth year Chinese at Yale (CHNS 154/155), I placed into the top textbooks of IUP’s “intermediate level,” 思想与社会 (“Thought and Society”) and 实话实说 (“Frankly Speaking”). At the end of each eight week module (there are two modules in fall and spring, each), everyone graduates to the next level of textbooks. Generally speaking, the academic quality of the textbooks is very good, and I enjoy learning from them.

Even though IUP’s textbooks have a set sequence, there is a certain amount of flexibility within the core, especially towards the higher levels. In the first few years of Chinese, everyone studies the same general-purpose vocabulary and grammar. After a certain point, though, the scope of what one can formally study in Chinese opens up really wide, and there’s no longer a clear hierarchy of vocabulary, i.e. the frequency of appearance in Chinese of the words you are learning is sufficiently low that importance is determined by what you are personally interested in and what you want to use Chinese for, rather than frequency. In this sense, the higher level IUP textbooks are somewhat independent of one another. For instance, the core textbook I am studying now, 参与 (“Participation”), is very literary. I’m learning a lot of words that I already know general-purpose synonyms for, but that have a more narrow and subtle usage. Assuming the student already knows words like “big,” this textbook goes on to teach words like “immense,” “colossal,” and “vast.” For some people at IUP, this kind of vocabulary is lower priority than, say, business, law, or economics-related vocabulary. In such cases, students can request to skip this textbook and go straight to the next “level,” which focuses on more direct, academic vocabulary. And some people might choose to skip that textbook in favor of studying some specialized set of vocabulary relevant to their work. The point is that, even within the core set of IUP textbooks, there is a certain degree of flexibility and academic independence IUP is willing to grant students if they seek it.

Apart from the core, all academic year students will get to take a few elective classes, including Chinese newspaper, business Chinese, Chinese 口语 (very informal, spoken Chinese), and two levels of classical Chinese. I had room for my first elective this semester and am taking the first level of classical Chinese (which is excellent and highly recommended, for the record.) In addition to these electives is the option to take another one-on-one class focusing on any topic, material, textbook, or aspect of Chinese one would like to study. I haven’t taken any of these individual electives yet, but I know people who have used them to study anything from vocabulary in their academic field, to reading a Chinese novel, to just focusing on their specific weaknesses in Chinese. Some people might even study something different every week in their individual elective. With these classes, the general agreement is that you get out of them precisely what you put in to them.

The academic structure of IUP seems to work well both for people who have a specific Chinese language agenda and want to direct their own studies, and for those who would just like to achieve all-around advanced abilities in Chinese. The solid and well-planned curriculum works well for the latter, while the flexibility to depart from it enables the former.

Workload

The difference between PiB and IUP is the difference between sprinting and long-distance running. The daily work load is significantly less at IUP, but with good reason. I was surprised by this initially, but gradually came to realize there is no way anyone could possibly maintain the level of focus and energy required from PiB-like programs for an entire year without burning out. With a slower pace, there is also time for review, and I find my retention is generally higher. In the first module, I had about three to four hours of homework per night. With the addition of classical Chinese this semester, it’s closer to five or more hours of homework per night. Some people put in more time, some people less. The immediate incentive to take the work seriously (besides learning Chinese, of course) is not grades, which are neither harsh nor terribly important. Rather, it is being well prepared for class. At IUP, your teachers and classmates are always well-prepared. When classes range in size from one to three people, if you don’t prepare, it shows. It’s a good implicit incentive structure. At the same time, the amount of time and effort it takes to be well prepared for class is very reasonable. Although at IUP, you can and should spend a majority of your time studying and practicing Chinese, there is also enough free time to pursue on your own all the cultural activities you didn’t have enough time for your first time around at PiB (or HBA, ACC, etc).

Social Independence

IUP doesn’t arrange your life outside of class. This might seem unfortunate, but you can really use this fact to your advantage.

For one thing, IUP doesn’t arrange housing. Most people live in apartments off campus. Living on campus is possible, as is living with one of the host families associated with IUP. Finding a place to live can definitely be stressful. The good news is that the IUP Google group connects IUPers, current and future, so there is a network of information and people to help you find a suitable housing arrangement. I’m living with a young IUP teacher (and another Chinese woman who works at Google) who sent out an email to the group looking for a third apartment mate. Other people live in apartments former IUPers have moved out of. Some people find other IUPers to live with through the Google group and then search for an apartment together once in Beijing. There’s really no limit to the possibility of living arrangements, it just takes some extra time and effort to arrange.

Because everyone lives in different places, IUP mostly leaves your life outside of class up to you to determine. There are three or four field trips throughout the year (including one or two overnight weekend trips) that IUP arranges and a social organization that has activities about once a month to foster friendships between IUP students and Tsinghua/Beida students, but apart from that, you are mostly on your own. A lot of other Light Fellowship approved programs seem to take a more active role in students’ free time, arranging field trips on most weekends and providing extracurricular activities, which I think works great for a first-time experience in China. Though IUP differs from these programs in this respect, this is actually a great opportunity to find activities on your own. In Beijing, it is easy to make your own Chinese friends and get involved in whatever activities you would like to. I’ve audited a few Tsinghua courses, participated in a translators’ club at Tsinghua, and been making some Chinese friends in my free time. There are lots of other activities IUPers have dedicated their spare time to, but you have to take the initiative.

Language Pledge

This section really ought to go under “Social Independence.” IUP has a language pledge within the academic building and at all IUP-sponsored activities. Of course, this only amounts to about four hours of your day on weekdays and not at all on weekends. All encompassing language pledges make a lot of sense at all-encompassing programs, like PiB. IUP is a different story. Because everyone lives in different places, and is involved in their own activities outside of IUP, IUP doesn’t try to control what language you speak outside of the program. As with any of the freedoms IUP allows its students, it is up to the student to find a way to speak Chinese outside of class. It is not hard find ways to do so in Beijing, whether through living with Chinese people, making Chinese friends out of class, making your own pledge with IUP friends (probably the hardest), etc. But as always, it is a matter of initiative.

Final Recommendation

For anyone with a similar background and level in Chinese (i.e. previously spent a summer at a language program in China and has studied through third or fourth year Chinese), IUP fall/spring/academic year is a great choice that you really can't go wrong with. I am very happy with my decision to return to Beijing to study at IUP. 

share on: facebook

Sunday, September 12, 2010

IUP classes, and a bit of "胡同话"

The first week of class is already over! I am hesitant to draw any firm conclusions about the general workload and difficulty of IUP classes yet, since the first week may not be fully representative. But with that caveat aside, here are my general impressions.

The IUP workload and learning pace is very reasonable. On top of four hours of class per day, I have about four hours of homework per night. This means that, not only do I have a fair amount of free time every day, but I’m also able (so far) to prepare thoroughly for class, and retain a good proportion of the assigned material. I suppose what’s so surprising about this is the marked contrast with PiB, where the strategy seemed to be “let’s cram as much into your brains in eight weeks as humanly possibly.” I think both approaches are valid, but the latter is more appropriate for a year long program.

I also very much like the structure of IUP classes – three of my classes have just three students, and the other class is one-on-one. The 单班课 (individual class) is easily my favorite. The class never moves on until I fully understand everything, and I can ask as many questions as necessary to get to that point. At the same time, the fact that it’s a one-on-one class does not mean it is any less structured or formal than the larger classes. Most importantly, it is easy for me to pay full attention in this class, as there is no temptation to zone out while the teacher is talking to other students – probably my weakest point in larger classes. But even the larger classes, 合班课 (three-on-one classes), are great, too, as three students is still much smaller than the size of Chinese classes I’ve had in the past. I can still ask my own questions in these “larger” classes, but I’m also learning from my classmates’ questions – things I might not have thought to ask on my own. I distinctly prefer all of these classes to PiB’s 大班课 (8 student classes), because it is far less embarrassing to make mistakes in them. The small class sizes also afford finer-grained placement, so I feel more or less on par with my classmates.

Classes aside, I did some exploring yesterday. I took the subway for the first time on this trip, and got off at 鼓楼大街 (Gulou Dajie) to go see the bell and drum towers. I didn’t know for sure that the subway station would be in walking distance of the towers, but I thought it was a good guess, as it shares the name. Once out of the station, I caught sight of some old-looking structures and started walking towards them. Sure enough, I arrived at the Drum and Bell Towers about fifteen minutes later. I was a little annoyed with myself that there was only about 40 minutes left before both closed, but simultaneously pleased to have found them before closing at all. I first ascended the bell tower, which, according to a sign at its base, houses “the most heaviest and biggest ancient bell in China.” More specifically, it was cast under the reign of Emperor Yongle, to announce the time throughout the day. Upon my arrival at the top of the drum tower, I discovered I was just in time for the final drum performance of the day. Given that I had only arrived at a subway station that I was guessing would be in the vicinity of these towers less than an hour prior to their closing, I think I lucked out.

It happens that these towers are in the center of a very old neighborhood in Beijing, consisting of hutongs (胡同), long alleys of courtyard houses dating as far back as the Ming Dynasty. Hutongs and life in hutongs have fascinated me since I first learned about them in my high school Chinese class, since they stand in such stark contrast to the rest of the rapidly developing city of Beijing. There is tremendous economic pressure to destroy these old neighborhoods in favor of shopping malls, business centers, tourist attractions, and other money-making ventures. Accordingly, their presence is in rapid decline. In fact, the problem of their destruction was the topic of one of our lessons at PiB last summer, and was the setting for a great Chinese movie we watched in parallel. (The movie is called Shower – I highly recommend it!) While I have grappled with this problem, and can certainly understand the economic incentives behind their destruction, I think I ultimately come down on the side of sentiment. Culture has an intangible value to society, and the hutongs, once destroyed, can never be replaced. The one criticism of the hutongs that I still have difficulty countering is that the quality of life in them is substandard. Their narrow alleys and walkways are a fire hazard, and modern conveniences, like plumbing and flush toilets, are lacking. Is it hypocritical of me to hope these historic neighborhoods are not destroyed, when I, myself, would be unwilling to be a resident? I’ve read interviews with hutong residents who say living in them is unclean and unpleasant. Then again, a small shopkeeper I talked to yesterday said he liked growing up in the hutongs. (On a completely unrelated note, this shopkeeper also gave me a free booklet with some of Confucius’s teachings. Who knew one of my newly-learned vocabulary words, 孝道 (filial piety), would come in handy so soon!) I am, nonetheless, pleased to see that some effort is being taken to preserve the hutongs (at least the more visible ones). The hutongs I visited yesterday have just recently avoided destruction, at least for the time being, according to this New York Times article (courtesy my friend, Elizabeth): http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/08/world/asia/08briefs-REDEVELOP.html?ref=china

Here are some pictures from my adventure.

A hutong neighborhood, as seen from the top of the Drum Tower.

Propaganda banner over a sanlunche ("three-wheeled vehicle") in a hutong.

View of a hutong.

The drum performance.

share on: facebook